header-logo header-logo

09 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Important ruling on care home duties

The Court of Appeal has provided clarity on the Art 2 obligations of the State to protect life where a person in a care home is the subject of a deprivation of liberty safeguards (DoLS) authorisation and may have died following errors in medical care and treatment

Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice’s lead judgment, in R (Maguire) v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde [2020] EWCA Civ 738, may have particular relevance in light of the devastating impact of COVID-19 on thousands of care home residents.

 

The court dismissed the appeal. The case concerned an inquest into the death of Jacqueline Maguire, a care home resident with Down’s syndrome, who died of natural causes.

Emma Price, barrister at 5 Essex Court, said: ‘The decision is likely to be a very significant one for coroners and practitioners in coronial, mental health and healthcare law (NHS Figures suggest that about 200,000 applications are made for DoLS per year, about half of which are granted), especially in the light of the significant number of deaths of those in care homes in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

‘The headline to take away from the Court of Appeal’s decision is that the operational duty to protect life under Art 2 is not owed to those in a vulnerable position in care homes for all purposes. In the event of a death which follows either alleged failures or inadequate interventions by medical professionals, there are “very exceptional circumstances” which can give rise to a breach of the operational duty under Art 2, but there was no evidence that such circumstances existed in Jacqueline Maguire’s case.’

Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll