header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-detail

The impact of GDPR (Pt 1)

nlj_7762_carousel_morrison

Organisations that have had a ‘lackadaisical attitude’ so far to the data protection overhaul scheduled to take effect next May ‘have a lot of work to do’, lawyers have warned.

Once the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force, non-compliant organisations that commit a serious breach risk fines of up to 4% of their annual worldwide turnover for the preceding financial year or €20m (whichever is greater). The current ceiling on data protection violations is £500,000.

The GDPR will impose significant obligations on organisations that process personal data, and creates numerous challenges. These range from an obligation to demonstrate consent and the new right to be forgotten to the requirement on all public bodies to appoint a data protection officer.   

In the first of a four-part series in NLJ on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Rollits specialists David White, senior solicitor, and Tom Morrison, partner, explore why the current data protection legislation needed updating and provide an overview of some of the key changes being introduced.

Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll