header-logo header-logo

22 January 2019
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Immigration Rules overhaul

The Law Commission has proposed a major refit of the UK’s Immigration Rules, which it says are complicated and difficult to follow.

The overhaul would not affect any substantive policy but would focus on how the Rules are drafted and presented: for example, removing unnecessary repetition, providing a less confusing structure and using clearer language. It asks for views, in a consultation launched this week, on making the Rules less prescriptive by creating shorter, more general Rules supported by guidance that is illustrative only in order to give more discretion to caseworkers.

Since 1973, the Rules have grown from 40 pages to about 1,100 pages. Their complexity, the Commission says, adversely affects not only applicants themselves but also Home Office caseworkers who must put them into practice.

Law Commissioner for Public Law, Nicholas Paines QC, said: ‘As the Immigration Rules have become longer, more detailed and more specific, they’ve also become more complicated and harder to follow for applicants.

‘The Home Office has asked us to help put things right. Our proposals would introduce clearer language, and improve the presentation of the Rules so they’re easier to understand and follow.’

According to the Law Commission, one problem is that the Home Office has pursued a policy of making the Rules more prescriptive and therefore more transparent in recent years. Unfortunately, however, this has made the Rules longer, more complicated and harder to follow. Consequently, applicants may find it necessary to seek expensive legal advice in order to navigate the system.

Its proposals include taking a uniform, standardised approach to the wording, headings, definitions and section numbering; removing overlapping provisions; and investigating whether adding hyperlinks, signposting and interactive tools could help applicants.

The consultation, Simplifying the Immigration Rules, closes on 26 April.

Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll