header-logo header-logo

14 January 2016
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Immigration Bill debate

Peers have expressed concern that the Immigration Bill does not define what constitutes a “genuine obstacle” to failed asylum seekers leaving the UK.

The Bill allows the home secretary to support asylum seekers who may become destitute only if they do not face a “genuine obstacle” to leaving the UK. However, the Bill leaves the definition of the term to secondary legislation.

In a report published last week, the House of Lords Constitution Committee called for the term to be defined in greater detail and in primary legislation so that it can be scrutinised by Parliament. They warned that Peers are being asked to legislate on a provision that will affect people in potentially desperate circumstances without a clear understanding of what the rules would mean in practice.

The committee also raises concerns about provisions to give the home secretary powers to overrule independent judicial decisions of the First-tier Immigration Tribunal on immigration bail conditions.

Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll