header-logo header-logo

Immigration

18 November 2010
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Elmi and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2775 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 124 (Nov)

What mattered in relation to an application for fee exemption under the Immigration and Nationality Fees Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/1158), the Consular Fees Order 2008, SI 2008/676 and the Immigration and Nationality (Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2008, SI 2008/544 was that:

(i) the nature of the underlying visa or entry clearance application should be clear so that it was possible to see whether a fee was payable and whether a fee exemption might be available;

(ii) it was clear that an application for fee exemption was being made;

(iii) an evidential basis for the fee exemption was provided; and

(iv) a fee waiver power existed, even if it changed over time. If a fee exemption application was made and relevant evidence was not provided, it was to be hoped that the department would tell an applicant what at least the target of any evidence should be.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll