header-logo header-logo

Immigration

03 February 2017
Issue: 7732 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2017] EWHC 59 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 90 (Jan)

The Administrative Court declared the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (Fast Track Procedure) Rules 2005 (SI 2005/560), ultra vires. It held that an application to quash or to set the appeal decision aside had to be made to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), and decisions which had been made by a tribunal with jurisdiction and which had not necessarily been unfair required more than the fact of the declaration to warrant their being set aside or quashed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll