header-logo header-logo

15 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of AA (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 167, [2016] All ER (D) 44 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant Somali national’s appeal against the dismissal of his claim for judicial review, seeking a declaration and damages in the tort of false imprisonment and for breach of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights on the basis that he had been unlawfully detained by the defendant secretary of state. Among other things, it held that each of the conclusions reached by the deputy judge that had underpinned his conclusion that the period of the claimant’s detention had been reasonable in all the circumstances had been material conclusions he had been fully entitled to have reached on the evidence available to him.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll