header-logo header-logo

Immigration

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Kiana and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] All ER (D) 110 (Apr)

Section 4(2) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 contained no power for the secretary of state to provide subsistence only support to a failed asylum seeker.  The s 4 regime had to be contrasted with that under s 95 where a wider power was conferred on the secretary of state to provide support for asylum seekers and dependants of asylum seekers. Section 95 allowed for forms of support other than accommodation, on a standalone basis - that was not the case under s 4.

There was no suggestion that Parliament had intended the forms of support available under s 4 and s 95 were to be provided on a similar basis. Further, had s 4 conferred on the secretary of state a power to provide subsistence only support, the 1999 Act would be expected to provide an express right of appeal against a refusal to provide such support—it did not.

Moreover, s 4(2) of the Act did not permit the secretary to state to discharge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll