header-logo header-logo

07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Kajuga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 426 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 273 (Feb)

It was a matter of common sense that if a person obstructed the deportation process and fails to cooperate with the secretary of state then the “reasonable” period would be longer and probably much longer. While it might not be indefinite, it could certainly extend to a period covering, if necessary, a number of years, provided the secretary of state made real and continuous efforts to ascertain where the detainee had come from and should be deported to. The period would continue to be reasonable until those efforts were finally exhausted. If that were not the case then those liable to deportation could frustrate the process and work it to their own advantage by failing to co-operate with the authorities. Their release back into the community could generate fresh claims, prolonging the deportation process and using up further resource.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll