header-logo header-logo

Immigration

30 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of BB) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission and another [2012] EWCA Civ 1499, [2012] All ER (D) 210 (Nov)

Neither the detention of an individual pending his deportation, nor the grant of conditional bail pending deportation, involved a determination of civil rights within the meaning of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The expulsion of an alien and his detention pending expulsion did not determine his civil rights. At most, they incidentally had an effect on those rights. The distinction was critical in the context of a state’s control over aliens who were within its territory. The fact that the exercise of the power to deport would have an effect on an individual’s right to respect for private and family life or other rights did not mean that the exercise of the power involved a determination of the individual’s civil rights. So too, the fact that the detention of an individual pending deportation would affect him in that way did not mean that the detention involved a determination of civil rights. Nor could it be said that the exercise of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Private wealth and tax offering boosted by dual qualified partner hire

Sackers—John Card

Sackers—John Card

Pensions firm announces hire in project management team

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Staffordshire firm appoints head of commercial property

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll