header-logo header-logo

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

Immigrants' group hits out at unfair fee increases

Fee hikes for settlement applications and required tests for applicants will have a "disproportionate impact" on poor and excluded groups, a campaign group is warning.

As of 2 April 2007, all applicants for indefinite leave to remain need to provide evidence that they have passed either the Life in the UK test or an English for Speakers of Other Languages’ test which includes citizenship materials.

The Home Office says the aim behind the new requirement is to encourage people to learn English and to gain knowledge of UK traditions, structures, laws and democratic processes.

However, the new rules mean the fee for applying for settlement has more than doubled from £335 to £750.

According to the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI), the increase in fees will have a “disproportionate impact” on particular racial groups who are among the poorest in UK society, including Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Somalis and Ethiopians.

JCWI spokesperson Rhian Beynon says: “Many of these groups will be unemployed or in low paid and temporary work with little job security. The £750 fee up from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll