header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Michael Walsh
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Imaginary intentions?

Finding common intention after Kernott v Jones.
Michael Walsh reports

“This is a cautionary tale, which all unmarried couples who are contemplating the purchase of residential property as their home, and all solicitors who advise them, should study…” That was the opening warning given by Wall LJ in the recent case of Kernott v Jones [2010] EWCA Civ 578, [2010] All ER (D) 244 (May) a case that considers the division of the beneficial interest of the home of cohabitants after a long period of separation.

Facts

In 1981 Ms Jones purchased a caravan for £3,750, which was funded by a loan from her bank. In 1983 or 1984, Mr Kernott moved in with Ms Jones and they had a child. In 1985 Ms Jones sold the caravan for £8,000 and the couple bought the freehold of the property in question for £30,000. Ms Jones contributed £6,000 from the sale of the caravan and the rest of the purchase was financed by an endowment mortgage.

During their relationship Mr Kernott would give Ms Jones £100 per week and from that and her own earnings she

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll