header-logo header-logo

22 March 2023
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Illegal Migration Bill inquiry calls for evidence

The Joint Committee on Human Rights is seeking evidence from lawyers as part of an inquiry into the Illegal Migration Bill.

The Bill’s stated aims are to cap the number of people admitted under ‘safe and legal’ asylum routes, combat people smuggling, and make removal easier.

The inquiry will look at how the Bill engages with European Convention rights and the UK’s obligations under the Refugee Convention and the UN Convention on Rights of the Child. Evidence is sought on removal, detention, children, modern slavery, entry, legal proceedings and any other issues.

Joanna Cherry KC MP, the joint committee’s chair, said: ‘It is disappointing that the government is seemingly intent to get this bill through Parliament as fast as it possibly can. Given the government has admitted there is a strong likelihood that this Bill will fail to meet human rights standards, detailed legislative scrutiny is vital.’

Submit evidence hereby 6 April 2023.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll