header-logo header-logo

04 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

If disaster comes…

Partners “worryingly” unaware of consequences of insolvency

Law firm partners are “worryingly” unaware of the significant personal costs they could face if their firm ceases to trade without a successor practice in place.

Even though the current climate for law firms is tough, one out of two law firm partners do not know what financial losses they might incur in the event of insolvency, according to a new report by accountants Baker Tilly, The importance of being financially stable.

The report offers advice to partners on different ways to assess stability within their firm, and how to cope with an unplanned failure. Under law firm regulation, the firm itself is required to be financially stable yet the report uncovered a lack of understanding of how to gauge stability and what it really means, and the implications of regulatory intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The report suggests that law firms may in future want to retain more of their profits in the business, even though this is not tax-efficient.

George Bull, chair of Baker Tilly’s professional practices group, says: “There is a worrying lack of knowledge and understanding about the implications of a law firm falling into insolvency. 

“All possible steps should be taken to avoid an unplanned cessation of business which can be very costly for individual partners. However, all too often, partners don’t take action in time, either because they fail to pay sufficient attention to their cashflow, or because they wilfully bury their heads in the sand.”

In the last year, several well-known law firms have gone under, including Midlands firm Blakemores, which closed in March after an SRA intervention. National firm Cobbetts collapsed in January, and was later sold to DWF. Yorkshire firm Atteys was shut down by the SRA in March. In October, financially struggling Manches was bought in a “pre-pack administration” deal by Penningtons.

 

Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll