header-logo header-logo

04 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

If disaster comes…

Partners “worryingly” unaware of consequences of insolvency

Law firm partners are “worryingly” unaware of the significant personal costs they could face if their firm ceases to trade without a successor practice in place.

Even though the current climate for law firms is tough, one out of two law firm partners do not know what financial losses they might incur in the event of insolvency, according to a new report by accountants Baker Tilly, The importance of being financially stable.

The report offers advice to partners on different ways to assess stability within their firm, and how to cope with an unplanned failure. Under law firm regulation, the firm itself is required to be financially stable yet the report uncovered a lack of understanding of how to gauge stability and what it really means, and the implications of regulatory intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The report suggests that law firms may in future want to retain more of their profits in the business, even though this is not tax-efficient.

George Bull, chair of Baker Tilly’s professional practices group, says: “There is a worrying lack of knowledge and understanding about the implications of a law firm falling into insolvency. 

“All possible steps should be taken to avoid an unplanned cessation of business which can be very costly for individual partners. However, all too often, partners don’t take action in time, either because they fail to pay sufficient attention to their cashflow, or because they wilfully bury their heads in the sand.”

In the last year, several well-known law firms have gone under, including Midlands firm Blakemores, which closed in March after an SRA intervention. National firm Cobbetts collapsed in January, and was later sold to DWF. Yorkshire firm Atteys was shut down by the SRA in March. In October, financially struggling Manches was bought in a “pre-pack administration” deal by Penningtons.

 

Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll