header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

I spy with my private eye

Extramarital affairs are up, prompting a huge rise in the use of private investigators by divorcing couples to confirm fears that their other half was cheating on them, family lawyers report.

The numbers using snoops to catch out their unfaithful spouses shot up to 49% of all divorcing couples in 2006, compared to just 18% in 2005, according to Grant Thornton Forensic and Investigation Services practice’s fourth annual survey of 100 of the UK’s leading family lawyers.

The survey showed that women were nearly twice as likely to use such a service to check up on their spouse than men—unsurprisingly, perhaps, given that in two thirds (69%) of cases it was men who played away.

According to the lawyers surveyed, the stated reason for marital breakdowns in the UK in 32% of cases was due to one partner having an affair during 2006, up from 29% in 2005 and 27% in 2004.

Behaviour was blamed for marriage breakdown in 17% of cases, followed by family strains in 8% of cases and decisions of a personal nature in 4% of instances.

Only 4% cited emotional and physical abuse as the reason for their divorce, down from 12% in 2005.
Andrea McLaren, head of Grant Thornton’s London matrimonial practice says one of the survey’s most surprising results was the fall in the number of couples who tried to hide assets from their estranged spouse. In 2006, only 10% of couples did so, down from 16% in 2005.

She says that given the House of Lords’ judgment in the Miller and McFarlane cases, this figure was expected to increase as spouses tried to keep assets out of the pot of wealth which the courts can carve up.
McLaren says that possible reasons for the decline could include the sophisticated forensic techniques now available to search for such “hidden” assets.

However, she adds that it could simply be due to the fact that women today have a stronger awareness of and involvement in their financial affairs than in the past.

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll