header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

I do, do I?

Edward Heaton courts the question: when is a marriage a marriage?

In the vast majority of divorce cases, there is no issue over the validity of the marriage in question, which is usually established to the satisfaction of the court by the production of a marriage certificate. This is not, however, always the case. Practitioners need to be alert to the fact that the term “marriage” means different things to different people. In certain circumstances, a marriage which may not, on the face of it, appear to satisfy the requirements under English law may still be treated as a marriage upon, for example, the death of one of the parties or the breakdown of the relationship in question for the purposes of determining the issue of the division of capital and income.

In the recently reported decision in the case of Al-Saedy v Musawi [2010] EWHC 3293 Fam, [2010] All ER (D) 292 (Oct), Bodey J reviewed briefly the common law presumption of marriage dating back to the 19th century and, while on the specific facts of the case, he determined that,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll