header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Freedom of association—Employment

Redfearn v United Kingdom (App No 47335/06) [2012] All ER (D) 112 (Nov)

European Court of Human Rights, Judge Garlicki (President), Judges Björgvinsson, Bratza, Hirvelä, Nicolaou, Kalaydjieva, De Gaetano, and F Araci (Deputy Section Registrar), 6 Nov 2012

It is incumbent on the UK to take reasonable and appropriate measures to protect employees, including those with less than one year’s service, from dismissal on grounds of political opinion or affiliation, either through the creation of a further exception to the one-year qualifying period under the Employment Rights Act 1996 or through a freestanding claim for unlawful discrimination on grounds of political opinion or affiliation.

The applicant worked as a bus driver for a private company, S Ltd, which supplied services to a local authority. He was employed in December 2003. The majority of his passengers were Asian in origin. There were no complaints about his work or his conduct at work and his supervisor, who was of Asian origin, nominated him for the award of “first-class employee”. Following revelations in a local newspaper about the applicant’s political affiliation, a number of trade unions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll