header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Embryo—Frozen stored embryos

Evans v United Kingdom (App. No. 6339/05), [2007] All ER (D) 109 (Apr)

European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber

Judges Rozakis (President), Costa, Bratza, Zupancic, Lorenzen, Turmen, Butkevych, Vajic, Tsatsa-Nikolovska, Baka, Kovler, Zagrebelsky, Mularoni, Spielmann, Jaeger, Thor Bjorgvinsson and Ziemele, and Mr E Fribergh (Registrar)

10 April 2007

Where the issue is one of the right to respect for the decision to become a parent in the genetic sense, the margin of appreciation to be afforded to the respondent state under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) has to be a wide one.

The applicant had to have both ovaries removed, but she and her partner, J, were informed that it would be possible first to extract some eggs for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) if the procedure was carried out quickly. Both the applicant and J signed a form consenting to the IVF treatment and that, in accordance with the provisions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (HFEA 1990), it would be possible for either to withdraw his or her consent at any time before the embryos

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll