header-logo header-logo

Human rights concerns for patients, prisoners & immigration detainees

15 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Mental health , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned

According to a report published last week by the NPM, an independent organisation which inspects places where people are detained, people with a learning disability and autistic people are sometimes being detained in hospitals for lengthy periods beyond the point of therapeutic benefit. It also warns of an ‘acute and worsening’ mental health crisis in prisons, where overcrowding means prisoners are held in cramped, dilapidated facilities with little privacy.

It highlights the number of people being detained for immigration purposes has risen, and there is no statutory time limit on detention for this purpose in the UK. It points out some individuals are detained for more than a year, and that indefinite detention has serious consequences, contributing to depression, self-harm and increased violence.

Sherry Ralph, chair of UK NPM, said: ‘These are not new concerns. They are the same patterns of systemic failure identified over more than a decade. This must stop.

‘Domestically, the UK NPM’s collective voice has influenced key legislative consultations and inquiries across all four nations of the UK, providing evidence-based recommendations on mental health law reform, equality strategies, and children’s justice and sentencing. We will send the report to government ministers and committees and seek further assurances that necessary changes will be made.’

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘We urge the government to address the concerns raised in this report and ensure that everyone is able to access their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

‘The Law Society has been lobbying on the Mental Health Bill, which protects people with learning disabilities or autistic people from being detained inappropriately. This protection must be extended to all types of hospital detention.

‘Prison lawyers play a crucial role in supporting those in terrible conditions in prison, but their numbers have been dwindling alarmingly. The government has finally announced that prison law legal aid fees will increase. This is a step in the right direction but annual reviews of fees and cost-of-living increases are needed to stabilise the future of the profession.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll