header-logo header-logo

05 May 2017
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Case law
printer mail-detail

Human rights

R (on the application of Youngsam) v Parole Board [2017] EWHC 729 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 86 (Apr)

The Administrative Court held that the broad principle of the majority in R (on the application of Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] 4 All ER 251 on the scope of Art 5(4) of the European Convention on Human Rights, while obiter, ought to be followed by inferior courts. Accordingly, Art 5(4) had no application to the claimant’s judicial review proceedings, complaining that the defendant Parole Board’s delays in holding an oral hearing concerning his release, and the delay had not breached common law duty to act within a reasonable time.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll