header-logo header-logo

09 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights

R (on the application of K and others) v Secretary of State for Defence and another [2016] EWCA Civ 1149, [2016] All ER (D) 133 (Nov)

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of three Afghan nationals who had brought proceedings on the basis that they had worked for the defendant secretaries of state as covert human intelligence sources. The Divisional Court had, in earlier proceedings, refused the claimants’ application for further disclosure on the ground that the claims relied on by the claimants had not engaged art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court of Appeal held that the Divisional Court had erred in that the resolution of the claimants’ public law claim constituted a determination of their “civil rights”, within the meaning of Art 6 of the Convention and, accordingly, fell within the ambit of the Justice and Security Act 2013. Accordingly, the court held that there would have to be such disclosure as was necessary for the claimants to have the fair hearing to which Art 6 entitled them, and that, if such disclosure could not be agreed, the case would be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll