header-logo header-logo

29 April 2016
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights

PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 393, [2016] All ER (D) 120 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal allowed an application to set aside an interim injunction restraining the defendant from publishing a story about the claimant celebrity. Since the injunction had been granted, the identity of the claimant had been published in the foreign press and on the internet. While publication was likely to breach the claimant’s right to privacy, it no longer carried the same weight against the defendant’s right to freedom of expression. In those circumstances, it could not be said that the claimant was likely to obtain a permanent injunction and s 12(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 required that an interim injunction be refused unless the court was satisfied that the applicant was likely to establish at trial that the publication should not be allowed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll