header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Human Rights

R (on the application of King) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2522 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 134 (Oct)

Within the autonomous meaning afforded to “civil rights” by the European Court of Human Rights, a prisoner’s right of association with his fellow inmates was a civil right subject to the lawful exercise of discretion by the prison governor. The extent of the ‘basic’ association to which the inmate would be entitled was, subject to the performance of the Secretary of State’s statutory duty, in the discretion of the governor of the institution, but the existence of that discretion did not remove from association its quality as a personal right.  Further, a prisoner’s rights under Arts 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights would not be engaged by disciplinary proceedings before a prison governor unless the punishment imposed reached a certain level of seriousness.  
 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll