header-logo header-logo

The human condition

24 March 2011
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New commission to investigate UK Bill of Rights

Lord Lester and Helena Kennedy QC are among eight human rights experts appointed to a commission to investigate the case for a UK Bill of Rights.
The commission, due to file its final report and recommendations by the end of 2012, will be chaired by former permanent secretary, Sir Leigh Lewis. Its members include Sir David Edward PC QC, a former judge of the European Court of Justice, and Professor Philippe Sands QC.

Launching the commission this week, Ken Clarke, secretary of state for justice, said: “I hope that this work will help to inform the debate on human rights at home and assist us as we continue to press for reform of the Strasbourg Court.”

The Ministry of Justice said the independent commission would investigate the creation of a UK Bill of Rights that “incorporates and builds on all our obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, ensures that these rights continue to be enshrined in UK law, and protects and extends our liberties”. It will advise the government on potential reform of the European Court of Human Rights in the run-up to the UK’s chairmanship of the Council of Europe later this year.

Sir Leigh Lewis, says: “I hope that the commission’s final report will provide an objective and informed basis for the future debate on human rights in the UK.”

Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC, chairman of the board, British Institute of Human Rights, said: “We note that any Bill of Rights recommended by the government’s Commission is required to build on all our obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights and ensure that these rights continue to be enshrined in UK law.

“However, we are concerned that the terms of reference make no reference to the Human Rights Act. We call on the new commission, as a matter of urgency, to confirm that it will ensure any proposal for a Bill of Rights builds on the Human Rights Act, and is designed to enhance, rather than weaken, the protections and mechanisms already in place.

“Such an assurance would increase the prospect of a genuine and open debate about the legal protection of human rights in the UK.”

Human rights group, Justice predicted last year, in the report Devolution and Human Rights, that any attempt to substantially amend the Act would likely “prove a legal and political nightmare”.
 

Issue: 7458 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll