header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

HRA 1998: who benefits?

Richard Scorer considers the lessons & consequences of Smith

The issue of whether British soldiers serving overseas should have the benefit of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) was considered by the Supreme Court in a judgment delivered on 30 June 2010 (R (on the application of Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence [2010] UKSC 29, [2010] All ER (D) 261 (Jun)). The issue has provoked much media debate, including some ill informed comment in the tabloid press.

The case before the Supreme Court arose from the death in Iraq in 2003 of Private Jason Smith. Private Smith joined the Territorial Army in 1992, at age 21, and was mobilised for service in Iraq in June 2003. On 26 June 2003, after an acclimatisation spell in Kuwait, he arrived at Camp Abu Naji, his base in Iraq. From there he was moved to an old athletics stadium some 12 kilometres away, where a number of British soldiers were billeted.

Temperatures in Iraq in summer regularly exceed 55 degrees centigrade and on 9 August 2003 Private Smith reported sick, saying he could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll