header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

HRA 1998: who benefits?

Richard Scorer considers the lessons & consequences of Smith

The issue of whether British soldiers serving overseas should have the benefit of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) was considered by the Supreme Court in a judgment delivered on 30 June 2010 (R (on the application of Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence [2010] UKSC 29, [2010] All ER (D) 261 (Jun)). The issue has provoked much media debate, including some ill informed comment in the tabloid press.

The case before the Supreme Court arose from the death in Iraq in 2003 of Private Jason Smith. Private Smith joined the Territorial Army in 1992, at age 21, and was mobilised for service in Iraq in June 2003. On 26 June 2003, after an acclimatisation spell in Kuwait, he arrived at Camp Abu Naji, his base in Iraq. From there he was moved to an old athletics stadium some 12 kilometres away, where a number of British soldiers were billeted.

Temperatures in Iraq in summer regularly exceed 55 degrees centigrade and on 9 August 2003 Private Smith reported sick, saying he could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll