header-logo header-logo

24 July 2015 / Ben Collins , Nicola Newbegin
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

HRA 1998: The end

nlj_7662_collins

What would the abolition of the Human Rights Act mean for employment lawyers? Ben Collins & Nicola Newbegin share their thoughts

The government has backed off from early legislation to abolish the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) by omitting proposals for reform from the Queen’s Speech, instead merely stating that the government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”. However, there is no suggestion that the government has abandoned its plan entirely. What might the consequences of abandoning HRA 1998 be for the employment law community?

There is one school of thought which suggests that human rights add little to the protections offered by domestic and EU legislation on, eg, dismissal, discrimination and whistle blowing. Mummery LJ observed in Leach v Ofcom [2012] EWCA Civ 959, [2012] IRLR 839 that: “‘Human rights’ points rarely add anything much to the numerous detailed and valuable employment rights conferred on workers,” and Elias LJ cautioned in Turner v East Midlands Trains [2012] EWCA Civ 1470, [2013] 3 All ER 375 that: “Strasbourg jurisprudence adopts a light touch when reviewing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll