header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Housing

Yemshaw v Hounslow London Borough Council [2011] UKSC 3, [2011] All ER (D) 187 (Jan)

The definition of “domestic violence” for the purposes of s 177(1) of the Housing Act 1996 included physical violence, threatening or intimidating behaviour, and any other form of abuse which, directly or indirectly, might give rise to the risk of harm. “Physical violence” was not the only natural meaning of the word “violence”. It was commonplace to speak of the violence of a person’s language or of a person’s feelings. When used as an adjective it could refer to a range of behaviours falling short of physical contact with the person. By the time of the Act, the understanding of domestic violence had moved on from a narrow focus upon battered wives and physical contact. Even if that were wrong, there was no doubt that it had moved on since.

The courts recognised that, where Parliament used a word such as “violence”, the factual circumstances to which it applied could develop and change over the years. Although it was impermissible to construe the meaning of one phrase by reference to the meaning of another,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll