header-logo header-logo

05 January 2017
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house lawyers face conflict

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) should exclude in-house legal teams from its reporting and accountability regime as in-house lawyers could face a conflict of interest with their employers, the Law Society has said.

Responding to an FCA discussion paper on how and why the legal function is captured under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (DP16/4), Law Society chief executive Catherine Dixon, who resigned this week, said in-house lawyers would be unable to do their job effectively if they were part of the regime.

“Tensions could arise where demands of compliance with the senior managers regime (SMR) collide with their role as legal adviser to the organisation they serve,” she said.

“It could result in the organisation not getting the expert in-house legal advice they need—which is not in the interests of the organisation or the regulatory authority conducting any investigation as it could result in the organisation not doing the right thing or in delays whilst external advice is sought.

Issue: 7728 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll