header-logo header-logo

In-house lawyers demand move from hourly billing

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-detail

News

Two-thirds of in-house counsel would pay higher fees for high value work if they were charged less for low value work, research shows.

The new research—Stop the Clock?—by the C&I Group and BDO Stoy Hayward shows that while most practising lawyers use the hourly billing system, there is a growing demand for other options.

Deepak Malhotra, C&I Group London region chairman, says: “If in-house counsel and law firms are to explore a new approach to billing it has to be within a climate of trust. The survey proves that now is a unique time where both parties are willing to discuss fees in a transparent manner.”

The survey of 171 C&I Group members reveals that 97% of in-house counsel have used hourly billing in the last 12 months, although it rated lowest in terms of satisfaction of current billing methods.

The most popular alternative to hourly fees is having a menu-style approach, allowing in-house counsel to pick the most preferred billing method that best suits the particular job—47% chose this as the current best option.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll