header-logo header-logo

In-house counsel on the rise

28 April 2010
Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law firms need to reassess their working methods to meet the expectations of in-house counsel, according to new research.

The Winmark Looking Glass Report 2010, The Legal World on its Future, says in-house counsel have grown in terms of number, role and status despite the recession and asks how law firms can match their expectations on fees, service delivery and commercial influence.

According to the report, based on research among top law firms and general counsel, companies are reallocating their legal budget to keep more legal spend in-house. On fees, general counsel “crave simplicity, clarity and predictability”, and law firms need to show a clearer link between what they cost their clients and the value they create.

Although the hourly rate is in declining use, 85% of general counsel say they still frequently use it. However, they would like to see more opportunities to negotiate value-based and results-based fees.

Despite the recession, a third of law firms have increased their IT spend and a quarter have boosted their marketing budgets. Marketing budgets are reallocating from traditional events such as hospitality to web and digital marketing.

While firms have been cutting headcount during the tough economic times, they will need to ensure they have enough commercial lawyers in place for the future. According to the report, clients will not put up with inflated salaries caused by lack of resources.

Sandie Okoro, general counsel, Barings Asset Management, says: “The legal profession faces a significant change in the coming years and it is becoming evident that the way to meet the associated challenges is not in isolation, but with both in-house and private practice working in genuine partnership.”

John Jeffcock, CEO of Winmark Ltd, says: “Our research shows that changes in the legal sector have spread faster than thought. The legal profession needs a better common script if it is to operate effectively in that changed environment.”
 

Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll