header-logo header-logo

04 September 2009 / Thomas Duggins
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Homing in on the recession

Property prices are affecting FDR payouts, Thomas Duggins finds

The former matrimonial home is often a couple’s most valuable asset and will form the core of negotiations surrounding the division of marital capital. After the boom years, the recent turmoil in the housing market presents new obstacles when dealing with the matrimonial home in settlement negotiations.

Valuation

The value of the former matrimonial home must be established before negotiations can begin on whether it is to be retained by one party or sold and the proceeds divided. Even if the property is to be retained by one spouse, the courts require an appraisal of value so that an assessment can be made as to the fairness of the financial settlement (H v H [2008] EWHC 935 (Fam), [2008] All ER (D) 415 (Apr)).

Form E requires the parties to provide a valuation obtained in the last six months, or their own “realistic estimate of the current market value”. It is sensible to invite three local agents to view the property and provide a market appraisal at this stage, rather than speculate on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll