header-logo header-logo

19 June 2015
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Home Office liable for EU documentation delays

The Home Office may have to pay compensation in future to anyone adversely affected by delays in issuing EU documentation confirming their right to reside in the UK, following a landmark test case.

In R (on the application of Hana Zewdu) v Secretary of State for the Home Office (Crown Office ref: C/6067/2013), Mr Justice Green last week found the Home Office unlawfully delayed reaching a decision on the claimant’s right of residence. The secretary of state conceded she was therefore liable to pay damages for loss of earnings as well as damages on an aggravated basis.

Non-European Economic Area (EEA) family members of EEA workers, the self-employed, students and the self-sufficient are entitled to a right of residence in the UK, under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations. Once the Home Office receives an application, it is obliged to immediately provide a Certificate of Application, which gives the bearer the right to work in the UK. The Home Office is then required to make a decision on the application within six months.

The European Commission has previously raised concerns about the Home Office’s failure to comply with these time limits. However, the Home Office has previously relied on the case, AB v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB), to show that it has no obligation to pay compensation.

Trevor Hatton, senior solicitor at Duncan Lewis, who acted for the claimant, says Zewdu means the Home Office will no longer be able to rely on AB: “This case confirms once and for all that the secretary of state will be liable to pay damages to any applicant who has suffered loss as a direct result of a Home Office failure to provide EU documentation in a timely manner.”

Issue: 7657 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll