header-logo header-logo

11 December 2014 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Holiday pay hell?

johnson

What does Bear Scotland mean for employers, asks Sarah Johnson

The news has been full of holiday pay stories recently, but are employers facing holiday pay hell?

Yes, in that they will almost certainly have to include some variable payments, such as commission, in holiday pay, creating potentially significant liabilities. However, things looked a lot worse before the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in the joined cases of Bear Scotland Ltd and Others v Fulton and Others UKEATS/0047/13/BI, Hertel (UK) Limited v Woods and Others UKEAT/0160/14/SM and A mec Group Limited v Law and Others UKEAT/0161/14/SM (EAT decision).

Unite, the union representing the claimants, has now said it will not appeal.

Background

We are in this position because the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has held that our Working Time Regulations 1998 (regulations) do not comply with the European Working Time Directive (directive).

The directive provides employees/workers with at least four weeks’ paid annual leave in order to improve their health and safety. The UK “gold-plated” the directive, adding an extra 1.6 weeks’ paid holiday. The directive left member states

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll