header-logo header-logo

17 August 2016 / León Fernando Del Canto
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , EU , Property
printer mail-detail

Holiday hell

nlj_7717_delcanto

An unexpected European decision is bad news for Spanish holiday homeowners, says León Fernando Del Canto

  • Advocate General’s opinion that the temporal limit on the effects of the invalidity of “floor” clauses included in mortgage loan agreements in Spain is compatible with EU law is bad news for Spanish homeowners.

On 13 July the Advocate General gave a surprising opinion that the temporal limit on the effects of the invalidity of “floor” clauses included in mortgage loan agreements in Spain is compatible with EU law (see the Joint Cases of C-154/15 Francisco Gutiérrez Naranjo v Cajasur Banco S.A.U., C-307/15 Ana María Palacios Martínez v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA and C-308/15 Banco Popular Español SA v Emilio Irles López and Teresa Torres Andreu).

These clauses, which were used by the majority of banks in Spain, control the amount of interest being paid on a mortgage. This means that if the interest rate falls below the “floor”, as defined in the agreement, the consumer must still pay the set interest rate, leaving them unable to benefit from the dropping interest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll