header-logo header-logo

22 July 2022 / Mani Singh Basi
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Holiday abductions: far from home

88158
How should a left behind parent proceed when their child is wrongfully retained abroad? Mani Singh Basi reports
  • Wrongful retention of children under the 1980 Hague Convention: the options available to the parent left behind.
  • The inherent jurisdiction of the courts of England & Wales when a child is retained in a country which is not a signatory to the Hague Convention.

In the field of family law, there are unfortunately circumstances when a parent either takes a child from or does not return a child to their home country. Taking an example, a child’s mother and father may have an informal arrangement for contact. It may have been envisaged that one of the parents would take the child for a holiday from England to another country for three weeks during the summer holidays and this pattern may have occurred in the past, on each occasion the travelling parent returning with the child. On the next occasion, the travelling parent may not return with the child and may indicate an intention not to do so. In some circumstances, contact

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll