header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A historical parallel

web_backpage_1

Ashhurst, Bentham & British justice, Geoffrey Bindman QC reports

The celebration of the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta has produced an outpouring of euphoria and self-congratulation on the virtues of our legal system. And it is true that its principles have been hugely influential in establishing the rule of law throughout the world. Yet there is scepticism on two fronts. The fear of terrorism leads governments and sometimes judges to overstep its fundamental safeguards of personal liberty. Second, its promise of equal justice is increasingly undermined by restrictions on access to the courts to a privileged minority. There is an interesting historical parallel.

Mr Justice Ashhurst was appointed to the Court of King’s Bench in 1770 in succession to the renowned Sir William Blackstone. Little known to the public for more than 20 years, he became famous overnight after delivering a charge to the Middlesex Grand Jury on 19 September 1792. This was his instruction to the jurors to indict a number of individuals for sedition. They were accused of publishing pamphlets urging reform in Britain similar to the demands of the French revolutionaries whose

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll