header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

HIPS—what next?

Doing nothing about HIPs is not an option, says Peter Ambrose

With the rollout of home information packs (HIPs) finally underway, it is becoming apparent that the initial fears of solicitors that they would spell the end of residential conveyancing appear to be lessening. Indeed, for many solicitors, workloads have never been higher, and the introduction of HIPs seems unlikely to dent their business.

The delay to the introduction of HIPs has definitely been a blessing to the property market and the initial four-bedroom rule means their impact on the house selling process has been significantly reduced. However, for solicitors, the question remains about how to get involved with HIPs and what is the most prudent approach.

Media coverage about HIPs only being required for four bedroomed properties or larger has raised awareness of this restriction. However, the triggers for the introduction of HIPs for smaller properties are less well known. The government recommended that when there are over 2,000 domestic energy assessors (DEAs) accredited, HIPs will be extended to three bedroom properties—a significant portion of the housing market.  Although this milestone has been passed,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll