header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Michael Garson
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Property
printer mail-detail

HIP hype

The government’s botched roll-out of HIPs is distorting the market, says Michael Garson

By a series of tactical withdrawals announced periodically since the beginning of January 2005, the government has pulled back from the implementation of the home information pack (HIP) as originally conceived. The relegation of the home condition report (HCR) in July 2006 considerably weakened the potential for the pack to change the culture of the buying and selling process, despite the publicity extolling the energy performance certificate (EPC) and recommendation report. Other changes to permit first day marketing and to limit the compulsory content of the pack have been made for pragmatic reasons. However, by reducing the extent of seller disclosures at the marketing stage, these measures have undermined the usefulness of the pack at the later contractual stages of a transaction. The pack went live on 1 August 2007 for four-bedroom homes only and, before any feedback from the market had been published, three-bedroom properties were added from 10 September. The requirements for local and drainage searches and additional leasehold information quickly turned out to be as controversial as had been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll