header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

HIP extension attacked

In brief

The government’s decision to extend the mandatory use of home information packs (HIPs) and energy performance certificates (EPCs) from next week has been branded “highly irresponsible” by the Law Society.
The society says the government should have conducted a thorough review of the first phase of HIPs and EPCs before extending the scheme to smaller properties. The attack follows the announcement that HIPs and EPCs will be rolled out to three bedroom properties from 10 September.

Paul Marsh, Law Society vice president, says: “We are deeply disappointed that the government is continuing its cavalier approach to HIPs and the home buying process.

“The government needs to wait to ensure that the first tranche of HIPs has operated successfully before considering rolling it out to smaller properties, rather than rushing ahead prematurely. October would be a more acceptable earliest date for the introduction of HIPs, so that in September a full review of the introduction of HIPs could take place.”

The government, he says, appears to be bowing to pressure from those with a primary financial interest in the HIPs market, while there has been no formal communication to established stakeholders such as the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the National Association of Estate Agents, and the Law Society.

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll