header-logo header-logo

17 September 2025
Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail

Hillsborough Law will force officials to tell the truth

The long-awaited Hillsborough Law—creating a legal duty of candour on public authorities and officials—has been introduced in Parliament

The Public Office (Accountability) Bill is also known as the Hillsborough Law, in memory of the 97 Liverpool FC fans who died at Hillsborough Stadium in 1989, and whose families spent decades fighting for justice amid cover-ups and blame-shifting.

The Bill, drafted by Elkan Abrahamson, director at Broudie Jackson Canter, and Pete Weatherby KC, Garden Court North Chambers, was first presented to Parliament in 2017 but dropped due to the general election.

Abrahamson said the Bill’s introduction this week is ‘a momentous step’ that ‘will transform the face of British justice’.

It requires public bodies, including the police, to proactively cooperate with investigations and inquiries or face criminal penalties for non-compliance.

Bereaved families will be given access to non-means-tested legal aid at all inquests where a public body is involved, with the costs covered by the public body represented. Public bodies will be under a legal duty to ensure their spend is proportionate, stopping public bodies from hiring unjustifiably large legal teams at inquests.

The Bill also creates an offence of misleading the public in a seriously improper way, with criminal sanctions for the most egregious breaches.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer KC said: ‘Make no mistake—this a law for the 97, but it is also a law for the sub-postmasters who suffered because of the Horizon scandal, the victims of infected blood, and those who died in the terrible Grenfell Tower fire.’

Deborah Coles, director at INQUEST and Hillsborough Law Now, said the Bill was ‘a landmark step.

‘We have witnessed decades of institutional defensiveness and cruelty designed to evade scrutiny and accountability. We must now ensure the Hillsborough Law is delivered in full and those with vested interests to oppose it are resisted.’

It was not until 2016 that the Hillsborough inquests ruled the 97 were unlawfully killed—families campaigned to have the case reopened after a first inquest concluded ‘accidental death’ in 1991. Lord Justice Taylor’s inquiry, in 1990, concluded policing ‘broke down’. In 2012, the Hillsborough Independent Panel found police altered witness statements and tried to smear the victims. 

Categories: Legal News , Public , Inquests
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll