header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Highways

Ali v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1282, [2010] All ER (D) 193 (Nov)

Section 130 of the Highways Act 1980 was concerned with the protection of the legal rights of the public at large. The rights in question were the rights of the general public to use the public highway. The section related to legal rights of access, not the safety of the highway. It placed no express obligation on the highway authority to remove obstructions, and there was no justification for the implication of such an obligation, especially since express provision was made about the duty of a highway authority to remove obstructions in s 150.

Section 263(1) provided for the vesting of public highways in the highway authority, but the legal interest thereby created was an unusual and limited one. A highway authority was not an occupier of the highway and did not owe to highway users a common law duty of care. Sections 149 and 150 regulated the powers and duties of highway authorities with respect to the removal of highway obstructions and established a method of enforcement of the duty.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll