header-logo header-logo

18 March 2010 / Adam Chapman , Andreas White
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

High stakes

When can employees expect to benefit from legal representation? Adam Chapman & Andreas White report

As is widely known, employees who reasonably request accompaniment at a disciplinary hearing have a statutory right to be accompanied by a colleague or trade union representative (Employment Relations Act 1999, s 10). While in serious cases employees often request legal representation at disciplinary hearings, such requests are rarely granted. In light of recent Court of Appeal authority (R (on the application of G) v X School and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1), employers will need to consider this issue more carefully. In some cases of sufficient gravity, employees will have a legal right to legal representation at disciplinary hearings. 

G was a teaching assistant employed at X school when a complaint of sexual misconduct was made against him. The governors of the school carried out an internal investigation and conducted a disciplinary hearing, following which G was dismissed for abuse of trust. G was not permitted legal representation at the hearing. He appealed, and requested legal representation at the appeal hearing. The governors confirmed that their policy of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll