header-logo header-logo

30 November 2012 / Piya Muqit
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Human rights
printer mail-detail

High & dry

Survivors of torture will suffer further due to legal aid cuts, says Piya Muqit

The £350m cuts to legal aid, which are due to come into effect on 1 April 2013, will restrict access to justice for one of the most vulnerable groups of people in this country.

LASPO’s impact

Torture survivors seeking or granted refuge in the UK are already struggling to secure decent legal representation, and radical changes to the legal aid system following the passing of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 mean this situation will worsen considerably in 2013.

The Act will, with limited exceptions, remove or reduce legal aid funding for advice on immigration, welfare benefits, housing, family, debt, and employment, all of which affect Freedom from Torture’s clients.

While free advice and representation on asylum claims will still be available, we fear that the removal of legal aid for most immigration matters will be the last straw for many providers who are already struggling to sustain viable legal aid practices in the asylum and immigration field.

The Act is the latest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll