header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

High days & pay-offs

Ian Smith celebrates the highs & lows of recent tribunal decisions

In a month notable for the high-profile rejection of the “Heyday” challenge to the default retirement age of 65, but in a way that strongly suggested that it will need to be removed when the government carries out its promised review of it (now to be in 2010 rather than 2011 as originally indicated) and for the equally newsworthy decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that an employee who is sick while taking holiday can ask for the holiday to be rescheduled, the cases considered here are at the opposite end of the employment law spectrum where there is no obvious news and/or political interest, but where pronouncements on points of common law or statutory interpretation can have just as great an effect on the longer-term development of the law.

Ultra vires contracts

While it has always been clear that employment under an illegal contract is potentially void, destroying any rights, what is the position where the contract is ultra vires the putative employer? As Slade J said in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll