header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

High Court: Pirate websites can be blocked

The High Court has jurisdiction to stop internet service providers (ISP) allowing access to websites that breach trade mark rights by selling counterfeit goods, it has held, in the first case of its type.

The case, Cartier International and Others vs BSkyB and others [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch), concerned the trade mark rights of Richemont, owner of luxury brands such as Cartier and Mont Blanc. Richemont selected sites that wholly infringed its trade marks and sought an injunction against an ISP to block access.

The question arose of whether the High Court had jurisdiction to grant an injunction—the court held that it did.

Jeremy Blum, partner at Bristows, says: “This decision is a real development for brand owners in fighting online counterfeiting.

“Since L’Oreal v eBay and the recent s 97A copyright cases it was generally viewed that trade mark owners ought to be able to obtain an injunction against an ISP intermediary to block access to websites that infringe trade mark rights, and this is the first decision confirming the UK courts have jurisdiction to grant such an injunction as well as setting out the principles to be applied in determining if an injunction should be made.

“Broadly whether an injunction against an intermediary should be made, the court must assess whether the injunction is proportionate, effective, dissuasive and not a barrier to legitimate trade. The interesting point in future will be the range of websites that will be able to be blocked; for example this case involved websites wholly engaged in infringing activity.”

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll