header-logo header-logo

04 February 2026
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , Clinical negligence , National Health Service , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

High cost of clinical negligence outlined

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has urged the government to move towards a less adversarial system of clinical negligence, after the total cost to the NHS quadrupled within 20 years to an eye-watering £60bn

The PAC report, ‘Costs of clinical negligence’, published last week, highlighted ‘disproportionate legal costs’ with claimant legal fees more than tripling to £538m in 2024-25. Lower value claims with damages of £25,000 or less cost 3.7 times more in legal fees than victims received in damages.

In terms of types of case, brain injury suffered during maternity care represented 2% of all claims by volume but the damages accounted for 68% of total costs.

One factor behind the increasing costs is that claims are settled based on how much care would cost in the private sector rather than the NHS, which stems from a 1948 law. The PAC said this means the taxpayer may pay twice for clinical negligence—once for compensation and again if the victims uses the NHS for their care.

The PAC called on the government to produce within two months a national framework for improving patient safety with annual targets, and a national system for sharing data between NHS trusts. It called, in particular, for a government plan to improve maternity care and reduce the cost of claims in this area.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, PAC chair, said a less adversarial system would reduce costs and ensure claims are paid more quickly.

Dr Pallavi Bradshaw, medical director at Medical Protection Society, which assists healthcare professionals, said: ‘The government simply cannot afford to do nothing. A comprehensive strategy—which balances fair compensation for patients and affordability for the NHS—is urgently needed. This strategy must iron out the many inequities and flaws in the system—not least disproportionate legal fees in lower-value claims.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll