header-logo header-logo

03 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Helmet breaks copyright frontier

The force was with the manufacturer of the original Star Wars stormtrooper helmets in a Supreme Court hearing on copyright last week

The justices unanimously held that the helmets are not works of sculpture and therefore not protected by UK copyright law, in Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39.

They also held—in a “major” change of policy—that foreign copyright infringement claims can be brought in the English courts.

The defendant made the helmets for the first Star Wars film in 1976. In 2004, he began to produce and sell replicas. In 2006, Lucasfilm obtained judgment in default through the US courts.

In order to bring their case in England, Lucasfilm argued that the design was an artistic work and covered by copyright law. If it was a functional design then copyright protection would not apply.
Martyn Fish, partner at HGF Law, said: “It means any foreign company can try to enforce copyright in the UK courts, which is a major change.

“A lot of IP lawyers will be surprised by this judgment. It’s good news for us though as it may mean more work. It’s one more way of enforcing the law and may provide clients with a stronger remedy. I would be amazed if forum shopping didn’t take place.”

Danielle Amor, associate at Hogan Lovells, said: “Before now, you needed to litigate the infringements separately in each jurisdiction where your rights had been infringed.

“Claimants may now be able to bring actions in the UK against UK resident defendants for infringement of their rights in multiple jurisdictions.”

Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll