header-logo header-logo

03 September 2010 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Hello goodbye

Jack Straw took the opportunity of his retirement from Labour’s front bench to publicise his forthcoming memoirs...

Roger Smith bids farewell to an old hand & welcomes some new blood over the pond

Jack Straw took the opportunity of his retirement from Labour’s front bench to publicise his forthcoming memoirs. These, he promised, will not be of the “kiss and tell” variety. Few would have supposed otherwise. He did not serve Labour’s full time in office without considerable skills of discretion and diplomacy.

Immediate press interest centred on Mr Straw’s views on the Iraq war. Though formally supporting the decision to invade Iraq, he told the Chilcot inquiry that he was “haunted” by the decision. At about the same time, a “secret and personal” letter that he had written to Tony Blair materialised in which, just before the start of the second Gulf War, he indicated his doubts about the course on which his prime minister was so clearly determined. Jack Straw has seldom been accused of naivety.

The importance of Jack Straw to the law was in his reward for not resigning with Robin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll