header-logo header-logo

23 October 2015 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Held to account

nlj_7673_parpworth

MPs lobbying ministers: a basis for legal challenge? Neil Parpworth reports

It is well understood that one of the main roles of the backbench MP at Westminster is to hold the government of the day to account for its acts and omissions. In practice, this can be achieved through various means, including written and oral questions to ministers, debates in parliament and the work of departmental select committees on which MPs may serve. While these opportunities mostly arise in a formal setting, access to ministers may also be obtained behind the scenes, in the tea room and bars of the House of Commons or when MPs vote by passing through the “Aye” or “No” lobbies which adjoin the chamber. Indeed, the opportunity which this archaic form of voting presents to a backbench MP to buttonhole a minister in the absence of the minister’s retinue appears to be a key reason why the Westminster Parliament continues to eschew electronic voting. With the doors of the lobbies locked and MPs waiting to file through, a backbencher has the chance to bring a constituency matter to the attention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll