header-logo header-logo

23 October 2015 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Held to account

nlj_7673_parpworth

MPs lobbying ministers: a basis for legal challenge? Neil Parpworth reports

It is well understood that one of the main roles of the backbench MP at Westminster is to hold the government of the day to account for its acts and omissions. In practice, this can be achieved through various means, including written and oral questions to ministers, debates in parliament and the work of departmental select committees on which MPs may serve. While these opportunities mostly arise in a formal setting, access to ministers may also be obtained behind the scenes, in the tea room and bars of the House of Commons or when MPs vote by passing through the “Aye” or “No” lobbies which adjoin the chamber. Indeed, the opportunity which this archaic form of voting presents to a backbench MP to buttonhole a minister in the absence of the minister’s retinue appears to be a key reason why the Westminster Parliament continues to eschew electronic voting. With the doors of the lobbies locked and MPs waiting to file through, a backbencher has the chance to bring a constituency matter to the attention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll