header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012 / Mary Blyth
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Limitation
printer mail-detail

A heavy burden

The time is right to introduce a bespoke procedure for personal injury product claims, argues Mary Blyth

In the past 11 months there has been a tsunami of claims for defective medical devices, such as PIP breast implants and metal hip implants. How do we reconcile the procedure for personal injury law, so that it fits in with the demands of consumer and contract law for product liability cases and ensure that it is reasonable and proportionate?

In his final Access to justice report of July 1996, Lord Woolf set out a set of helpful protocols to accompany the Civil Procedure  Rules. Only four of the 12 protocols refer to personal injury claims specifically.

This is the time to introduce a product liability protocol for the reasons below:

  • the number of potential defendants increases in product liability claims (manufacturer, perceived manufacturer, EU importer, supplier) and more investigation is required by the claimant;
  • there is a requirement for proof that the product is defective and this usually requires expert evidence;
  • the limitation may fall into one of three dates: Consumer Protection Act 1987
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll